In St. Gallen, I met with a doctor who has really been one of the leaders of EM development in Switzerland, and particularly in his canton. It was really a fantastic meeting, including a tour of a small, but very well-equipped ED. We talked more about some of the thoughts brought up by physicians in Lausanne: the competition between specialities; the hesitance of people to accept new specialities; the role of money and power in the development of healthcare systems; precisely how different the cantons all are in their EM systems. One thing that I want to mention that he said to me is something that is relatively obvious, but I think still deserves mention: emergency medicine is an interesting specialty in that it serves in many ways to do the opposite of what most specialties do; rather than attempt to further focus care, it seeks to provide a more general perspective on healthcare. In the ED, a patient can come in with a problem that is vague and then be referred to those who can appropriately treat them. This contrasts to a patient with a problem going to the emergency area of a given specialty, getting a work up and possibly at the end of it, finding out that while they are cleared for a particular system/area, they still have whatever problem brought them to the hospital in the first place. Thus, they end up having to start over at the next specialty. Of course, there are general practitioners and family physicians who can help with this process, but it can still be redundant…
The other truly interesting idea that we discussed was the ways in which the different cantons in Switzerland developed their systems. They truly are completely unique in many regions, while the systems developed similarly in others. When I asked the extremely broad question on why he thought the systems have developed as they have, the doctor said quite frankly, “Luck.” In many ways, it depends on what the hospital has at the time of development in terms of equipment, resources (including human resources) and the roles that physicians from different specialties took on in the development of EM in their respective ERs. What I loved about this answer was that it reminds me in many ways of the comments that I’ve heard about India….while India is very far behind Switzerland in terms of technology, development, resources, etc., a similar situation exists in which the different city-states are just completely different. On a cultural note, several people I’ve met in Switzerland have commented that Switzerland isn’t really a country in the way that other countries are; the cantons are linked, but they are leagues apart in terms of culture, language, organization, etc. (much like India). The cantons here, too, are very hesitant to accept instruction from other cantons or even federally, it seems, as they are very protective of their autonomy. It’s incredibly interesting as a phenomenon because it means that instead of working together to develop an effective system, often each canton will develop a system for itself from scratch. This, of course, can kind of be a limitation for the speed of advancements in terms of structure, but also in regards to the establishment of EM as a specialty as there is not really a strong united front. I feel like there may be a lot of lessons for a place such as India to learn from the Swiss examples…and I wonder if there will be a similar pattern of development. I imagine yes, though there is much more outside interest in the Indian development by organizations such as AAEMI, and therefore may be more guidance and the like.

Entries (RSS)